Sensoa International
  • Home
  • Wat we doen
  • Partners
  • Parlementaire groep
  • Nieuws
  • Page d'accueil
  • Ce que nous faisons
  • Partenaires
  • Groupe parlementaire
  • Actualité
  • Homepage
  • What we do
  • Our partners
  • All-party parliamentary group
  • News
  • Home
  • Wat we doen
  • Partners
  • Parlementaire groep
  • Nieuws
  • Page d'accueil
  • Ce que nous faisons
  • Partenaires
  • Groupe parlementaire
  • Actualité
  • Homepage
  • What we do
  • Our partners
  • All-party parliamentary group
  • News

Feminists are not responsible for population growth

14/8/2018

 
PictureMarlies Casier, policy adviser Sensoa.
According to Professor in bio-ethics Peter Singer (DM, 7 July) population growth has become a taboo due to “a bizarre coalition of the Vatican, which has always been against anticonception and birth control, on the one hand, and radical feminists on the other, who gave priority to women’s freedom to choose how many children they want.” I choked in my coffee. Peter Singer is not an opponent of women’s rights, quite the contrary. And indeed, immediately after, the professor stated that these feminists “had a point, namely that family planning is a women’s right”. “But”, he continued, “at the level of the collective this leads to problems they forget to take into account, as an increase of young children equally increases the need for more schools, hospitals, jobs, etcetera.” 

Really, would feminists have forgotten about that? Those who stand on the barricades for the right of every person to freely decide if, how many and when to have children are exactly those who tirelessly work to realise universal access to contraceptives. The Countdown 2030 Europe report that was published for World Population Day shows that we are still far removed from that: in low and middle income countries 80% of contraceptives are being paid out of pocket. For those who earn less than 2 dollars a day it is an attack on their family budget. It is feminists, myself included, who urge to prioritise investments in contraceptives. They do this by asking recognition of the reproductive rights of every person and by pointing out the many advantages of family planning. Lowering the pressure on public services is one of those.

If family planning is also the means to save the climate is a different question for which there is no conclusive scientific evidence. A study by Simon Calcoen for the World Health Organization concluded that the assumption that ‘less children’ automatically means lower CO² emissions doesn’t survive the reality check. Better access to health care services and pushing back poverty leads to a drop in the mortality rate, followed by a drop in the birth rate. However, while moving towards a higher living standard, the ecological footprint also grows, which cancels out the positive effects of ‘less children’ on total emissions. But more important is that we cannot equate the increase in CO²-emissions in developing countries with the emissions by overconsumption in our own countries. “What should have priority is to (help) achieve the development needs of the South, but in a more ecofriendly manner than the current industrial countries have been doing”, the study concluded. Apart from that, industrial countries should lead by example and promote alternative ways of consumption: limiting the overconsumption in the North has a far more direct impact on the climate than low fertility numbers in the South.

Does this mean the advantages of family planning are few? To the contrary. It is about the right of women to decide if they want to have children and the size of their family. Research shows that if women are given good information and access to modern methods of contraception, they too will choose for family planning. The May Lancet Commission’s report “Accelerate progress – sexual and reproductive health and rights for all” calculated that meeting the unmet need for family planning could avert 67 million unplanned pregnancies per year and combined with investments in maternal and newborn care could lead to a drop of 75% in maternal and child deaths. Family planning may not, however, be reduced to a means to avert climate change – for which the polluting Global North carries the responsibility. And definitely not when the assumed effect is not even proven.
​
Marlies Casier, international policy adviser for Sensoa 

Comments are closed.

    Archive

    January 2022
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    November 2020
    October 2020
    August 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    May 2016

    Categories

    All
    2030 Agenda
    Abortion
    Adolescents
    Afri
    Africa
    AIDS2018
    Alexander De Croo
    Amnesty Chair
    Amnesty International
    Antichoice
    Anti Gender
    Anti-gender
    Award
    Be Cause Health
    Be-cause Health
    Belgian Development Cooperation
    Belgiu
    Belgium
    Cervical Cancer
    Child Marriage
    Climate Change
    Comprehensive Sexuality Education
    Contraceptives
    Council Of Europe
    Countdown2030Europe
    Covid 19
    CPD
    CSE
    CSW
    Development Cooperation
    Discrimination
    Diversity
    Early Marriages
    EDCTP
    EDD
    Educaid
    Education
    Enabel
    EPF
    Equality
    E Tutorial Body&rights
    E-tutorial Body&rights
    European Development Days
    Event
    Family Planning
    Feminism
    Fistula
    Flag System
    FP2020
    FP2020 Summit
    Funding Gap
    Gender Action Plan
    Genderbased Violence
    Gender Equality
    Gender Norms
    Girls And Women
    Global Gag Rule
    Health
    HIV
    HIV/AIDS
    Hiv Prevention
    Hiv Treatment
    Hiv Vaccine
    HPV
    Humanitarian Crises
    Human Rights
    ICPD
    Infertility
    IPPF
    Key Populations
    LGBTI
    LSHTM
    Marleen Temmerman
    Maternal Health
    Maternal Morbidity
    Maternal Mortality
    Meryame Kitir
    Mexico City Policy
    Migration
    Minister De Croo
    Mozambique
    ODA
    Opposition
    Parliamentarians For The 2030 Agenda
    Parliamentary Delegation
    Perspective 2030
    Peter Piot
    Policy Note
    Population Growth
    Report
    Reproductive Rights
    Resolution
    RMNCH
    Rutgers
    SDG3
    SDG4
    SDG5
    SDGs
    Sensoa
    Sensoa Flagsystem
    Sexual And Reproductive Health And Rights
    Sexual Health
    Sexuality
    Sexual Rights
    Sexual Violence
    SGBV
    She Decdes
    She Decides
    SRHR
    STI
    Stigma
    Sustainable Development
    SWOP
    Teenage Pregnancies
    The Philippines
    Trump
    UHC
    UNAIDS
    UNESCO
    UNFPA
    UNICEF
    Unplanned Pregnancies
    UNWOMEN
    Urbanization
    Voluntary National Review
    WAS 2017
    WHO
    Women And Girls
    Women's Rights
    Worlds AIDS Day
    Young People
    Youth
    Zanzu

    RSS Feed