Sensoa International
  • Home
  • Wat we doen
  • Partners
  • Parlementaire groep
  • Nieuws
  • Page d'accueil
  • Ce que nous faisons
  • Partenaires
  • Groupe parlementaire
  • Actualité
  • Homepage
  • What we do
  • Our partners
  • All-party parliamentary group
  • News
  • Home
  • Wat we doen
  • Partners
  • Parlementaire groep
  • Nieuws
  • Page d'accueil
  • Ce que nous faisons
  • Partenaires
  • Groupe parlementaire
  • Actualité
  • Homepage
  • What we do
  • Our partners
  • All-party parliamentary group
  • News

Precedent in UN negotiations as HLM on AIDS ends with vote

17/6/2021

 
Picture
A high-level meeting (HLM) on AIDS under the theme - End Inequalities. End AIDS - was convened from 8 to 10 June 2021, in New York. The HLM made a comprehensive review of the progress on the commitments made in the 2016 Political Declaration towards ending the AIDS epidemic by 2030 and had to set out priorities for the coming years.

Promising start but rough ride
The outcome of the HLM-meeting was the adoption of a Political Declaration co-facilitated by the Ambassadors of Australia and Namibia. While the negotiations started with a promising strong zero draft, highlighting the key issues in the elimination of HIV and AIDs, such as attention for key populations, sexual and gender orientation and identity, SRHR and comprehensive sexuality education, reform of punitive and discriminatory laws, the negotiations turned out extremely difficult. 

Countries from the African group and the Caribbean continued to insist on a sovereignty paragraph, which would allow them to waive commitments. The Russian Federation, along with a number of other countries continuously criticised the process and submitted hostile amendments. The Russian Federation ultimately called for a vote which led to a Political Declaration being voted for the first time in UN history, setting a very dangerous precedent for future negotiations, multilateralism, and the overall political work of the UN. 

Russian Federation outvoted 
An overwhelming majority of Member States voted in favour of the negotiated text, with 4 countries voting against (Russia, Syria, Nicaragua and Belarus). The Russian Federation’s inflexible position must be understood as a clear message regarding their position on matters related to LGBTQI+ persons, sexuality and comprehensive sexuality education, where any possible compromise on the matters is simply impossible. 

Trend of hostage taking in UN negotiations 
The negotiations also testified of a growing trend in UN processes of a few isolated countries holding the overall process and the text hostage. The same tactic was used by the Russian Federation in a violence against women and girls resolution in the last session of the UNGA, when they were isolated and not able to force their way. Similarly, more recently in the CSW65, the same countries which were isolated on certain issues forced the hands of other Member States to accept a watered-down version of the text that was discussed and almost agreed to in the negotiation room.   

Strengths of the adopted political declaration
Whereas the final outcome of the negotiations is disappointing, the declaration has strong language on the importance of community-led and community based-responses. Human rights and gender equality language such as ensuring the ‘availability, accessibility, acceptability, affordability and quality of HIV combination prevention, testing, treatment, care and support’ were also included in the preambular paragraphs.  

The declaration also notes concern over the rate of new infections among adolescent girls, specifically in Sub-Saharan Africa and that AIDS is the leading cause of death of adolescent girls and women aged between 15 and 49, and welcomes regional and subregional initiatives aimed at accelerating actions and investments to prevent HIV, empower adolescent girls and young women and achieve gender equality. 
​ 
The text also recognises intimate partner violence (IPV) as one of the structural barriers that compromises their ability to protect themselves from HIV infection and calls for its elimination.  Furthermore, the inclusion of ‘multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination’ is a new addition towards ensuring an intersectional approach among groups. The language on key populations was improved but was highly contested.

Comments are closed.

    Archive

    January 2022
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    November 2020
    October 2020
    August 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    May 2016

    Categories

    All
    2030 Agenda
    Abortion
    Adolescents
    Afri
    Africa
    AIDS2018
    Alexander De Croo
    Amnesty Chair
    Amnesty International
    Antichoice
    Anti Gender
    Anti-gender
    Award
    Be Cause Health
    Be-cause Health
    Belgian Development Cooperation
    Belgiu
    Belgium
    Cervical Cancer
    Child Marriage
    Climate Change
    Comprehensive Sexuality Education
    Contraceptives
    Council Of Europe
    Countdown2030Europe
    Covid 19
    CPD
    CSE
    CSW
    Development Cooperation
    Discrimination
    Diversity
    Early Marriages
    EDCTP
    EDD
    Educaid
    Education
    Enabel
    EPF
    Equality
    E Tutorial Body&rights
    E-tutorial Body&rights
    European Development Days
    Event
    Family Planning
    Feminism
    Fistula
    Flag System
    FP2020
    FP2020 Summit
    Funding Gap
    Gender Action Plan
    Genderbased Violence
    Gender Equality
    Gender Norms
    Girls And Women
    Global Gag Rule
    Health
    HIV
    HIV/AIDS
    Hiv Prevention
    Hiv Treatment
    Hiv Vaccine
    HPV
    Humanitarian Crises
    Human Rights
    ICPD
    Infertility
    IPPF
    Key Populations
    LGBTI
    LSHTM
    Marleen Temmerman
    Maternal Health
    Maternal Morbidity
    Maternal Mortality
    Meryame Kitir
    Mexico City Policy
    Migration
    Minister De Croo
    Mozambique
    ODA
    Opposition
    Parliamentarians For The 2030 Agenda
    Parliamentary Delegation
    Perspective 2030
    Peter Piot
    Policy Note
    Population Growth
    Report
    Reproductive Rights
    Resolution
    RMNCH
    Rutgers
    SDG3
    SDG4
    SDG5
    SDGs
    Sensoa
    Sensoa Flagsystem
    Sexual And Reproductive Health And Rights
    Sexual Health
    Sexuality
    Sexual Rights
    Sexual Violence
    SGBV
    She Decdes
    She Decides
    SRHR
    STI
    Stigma
    Sustainable Development
    SWOP
    Teenage Pregnancies
    The Philippines
    Trump
    UHC
    UNAIDS
    UNESCO
    UNFPA
    UNICEF
    Unplanned Pregnancies
    UNWOMEN
    Urbanization
    Voluntary National Review
    WAS 2017
    WHO
    Women And Girls
    Women's Rights
    Worlds AIDS Day
    Young People
    Youth
    Zanzu

    RSS Feed